Ancient Of Days on :
I've already shared my thoughts with Radar on the matter, but here there written down...
I don't fully grasp why this needs to be a divisive issue.
Fact: There are a large number of embryos which, if not dedicated to stem cell research, will be destroyed anyways.
According to a 2003 report published by the RAND Institute:
"Using a conservative estimate between the two conversion rates from blastocyst to stem cells noted above (27 percent and 7.5 percent), the research team calculated that about 275 embryonic stem cell lines could be created from the total number of embryos available for research." [1]
Fact: Stem cell research and treatment does NOT EVEN REQUIRE AN EMBRYO!
In fact, much of the current research has led to a line of thought that adult stem cells are generally more useful than embryonic ones in practical treatments. [2]
Fact: The ethical and moral concerns of the general public has actually spurred the scientific community to find entirely new branches of study in stem cell research, such as non-destructive methods to harvest the cells, and creating the cells without the use of an embryo. [3]
I suppose I don't see the counter argument. If you can enlighten me, please do.
[1] http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9038/index1.html
[2] http://www.11alive.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=79461
[3] http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=16472
I don't fully grasp why this needs to be a divisive issue.
Fact: There are a large number of embryos which, if not dedicated to stem cell research, will be destroyed anyways.
According to a 2003 report published by the RAND Institute:
"Using a conservative estimate between the two conversion rates from blastocyst to stem cells noted above (27 percent and 7.5 percent), the research team calculated that about 275 embryonic stem cell lines could be created from the total number of embryos available for research." [1]
Fact: Stem cell research and treatment does NOT EVEN REQUIRE AN EMBRYO!
In fact, much of the current research has led to a line of thought that adult stem cells are generally more useful than embryonic ones in practical treatments. [2]
Fact: The ethical and moral concerns of the general public has actually spurred the scientific community to find entirely new branches of study in stem cell research, such as non-destructive methods to harvest the cells, and creating the cells without the use of an embryo. [3]
I suppose I don't see the counter argument. If you can enlighten me, please do.
[1] http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9038/index1.html
[2] http://www.11alive.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=79461
[3] http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=16472